Home >> Our Work >> Projects >> Khudoni hydropower plant, Georgia

Khudoni hydropower plant, Georgia


a
Browse updates

 

Quick facts

Size and costs:
With the planned 200.5 meter-tall arch dam, an underground powerhouse, and a 528 hectare water reservoir the Khudoni HPP would become the second largest hydropower plant in Georgia.

The costs are estimated at EUR 1.06 billion (GEL 2.75 billion).

Feasibility:
The project requires the resettlement of 2000 people, will negatively affect cultural heritage and will not bring significant tax revenues for Georgia.

The positive conclusions of a feasibility study on Khudoni’s technical and financial viability are being questions by observers as well as local communities.

Promoter & financiers:
The project company's beneficial owners are unknown, as are the financiers of the project. (The World Bank provided technical assistance for the feasibility study.)

The Georgian state provided 24 percent of the project costs without receiving a share in the project company or similar compensation.

The 702 MW Khudoni hydropower plant (HPP) is proposed to be built on the Enguri River in the picturesque mountain region of upper Svaneti in Georgia. The area is inhabited by the Svans, an ethnic group which has retained its language and traditions over centuries.

The Khudoni HPP will resettle around 2000 people and flood some of the villages threatening to corrode traditional lifestyles of the Svans and destroy pristine nature.

 

Displacement and locals' fierce opposition


Protests against Khudoni in 2013 in Kaishi.

The Khudoni HPP will displace around 2000 people (of the 12 000 who live in Upper Svaneti). A village to be fully resettled is Kaishi with its 800 inhabitants.

One fifth of Khaishi’s households is recorded as socially vulnerable and is living on allowances, the majority relying on agriculture for their subsistence. They fear that their situation will only deteriorate with the resettlement.

Supported by numerous other Svan communities, the people from Kaishi are fiercely opposing the Khudoni hydropower plant and have organised numerous public protests, rallies and blockades.

In 2013, 200 families of Khaishi even took a traditional oath in church, vowing they would protect Kaishi from flooding or, should they fail, face a curse that will haunt them and their families for generations.

 

Svans are known for being proud of and closely attached to their region. (Image: A worshiper during mass in Chuberi, a town upstream from Khaishi that will be affected by the planned Nenskra dam.)

 

Read more


People from Kaishi are being supported by other Svans and increasingly by public opinion in Georgia, despite intensive PR campaigns by the project promoters.

Growing solidarity with local communities in Georgia puts Khudoni dam in spotlight
Blog post | October 4, 2013

Georgian government and investors reject Ombudsman's offer to mediate in controversy over Khudoni mega dam
Blog post | February 6, 2014

Promoters of mega-dam in Georgia use front group and PR campaign and discredit local community
Blog post | February 27, 2014

The project promoters’ unwillingness to respond to locals’ concerns has further deepened the mistrust and disagreement.

  • Georgian authorities, instead of working with locals, responded to protests with increased police presence and intimidation.
  • The project company Trans Electrica has failed to communicate the project’s effects and has not disclosed clear plans for compensation or resettlement.

Georgia's deputy minister of energy tells locals before a public hearing in September 2013 that regardless of their protests, the Khudoni dam will be built anyway. Read more on our blog >>

This was worsened by the fact that more than 1500 ha land, part of which was traditionally owned by the local population yet not officially registered, were sold by the Georgian state to Trans Electrica for one dollar. Locals had not been informed about the deal.

 

Video: A historical view on the Georgian energy sector, the effects on local communities and the role of international financial institutions.

 

Doubtful public benefits & dodgy company


Most of the benefits that the Khudoni HPP is supposed to provide for Georgia and local municipalities are highly doubtful.

Independent review


In 2013, the Georgian government requested the Netherlands Commission for Environmental Assessment to review the draft Khudoni HPP Environmental and Social Impact Assessment.

The group suggested

  • better and transparent communication with locals,
  • a social cost-benefit analysis to assess the project's feasibility from a public perspective, and
  • developing a national energy strategy that takes alternatives to Khudoni into account

Download the report

Energy independence?

The contract signed by the concessionaire and the Georgian government will award 91 percent of the Khudoni generated electricity for exports. Georgia is only guaranteed to buy annually 133.9 mln kw/h (or only four days of power consumption in Georgia) at a fixed price of 5.84 US cents during the first ten years.

Tax revenues?

While electricity exports will improve Georgia’s trade balance, they will not generate fiscal benefits for the country as export is factually exempt from taxation with a tax rate of zero percent.

Apart from income tax on salaries, Trans Electrica Ltd. will only pay a property tax of 1 percent. It will not pay for the water usage.

Employment?

The experience with other Georgian hydropower projects such as Larsi, Paravani and Dariali (pdf) have shown that employment opportunities tend to be exaggerated and mostly limited to the construction phase. The operation of Khudoni will require skilled work force which is likely to come from far away.

 

Offshore company

Registered in the British virgin islands, the company's beneficial owners and the sources of financing are so far unknown.

The project company, Trans Electrica Limited, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, is represented by Indian nationals who have been so far silent about the beneficial owners of the company and the sources of financing.

The terms of the agreement for the construction of Khudoni HPP on a build, own and operate basis has been changed several times by the Georgian government and Trans Electrica Ltd. The project is heavily delayed but it is unclear whether the company has paid any penalties for delayed works.

 

Other impacts


The Svaneti region is famous for it's medieval stone towers.

Cumulative impacts on water streams

The Enguri river already hosts the world's sixth highest arch dam, the 1300 MW Enguri HPP, and the 240 MW Vardnili hydropower cascade.

In addition to Khudoni, nine other hydropower plants (including three large dams with reservoirs) are being planned.

When combined, the plants will have significant impacts on water resources and the environment. However, the Ministry of Energy has not assessed the cumulative impacts of these installations.

 

Cultural impacts

Upper Svaneti is a candidate site to be listed by the UNESCO World Heritage for its natural importance and well-preserved medieval architecture.

While the dam is outside of the UNESCO site boundaries, the construction of a hydropower plant will interfere with the cultural sites (according to the official scoping document (pdf)). Twenty-seven villages will be impacted directly and indirectly by the project, including Khaishi which is regarded as a political and cultural gateway to Svaneti.

Khaishi’s church of St. George, Lakhani’s church of St. Nicholas, a cemetery and archaeological sites will be flooded.

 

Seismic risks and land slides

Severe landslides, rock falls and erosion were observed upstream of the Khudoni site. Combined with the high sediment load on the Enguri River, the high geological risks could decisively shorten the lifetime of the Khudoni reservoir.

Svaneti is a seismically active zone and a possible dam failure could result in flooding of vast areas in the western part of the country.

Share:

Latest developments


 

Bankwatch in the media | June 28, 2012

By creating loopholes in environmental legislation, is President Mikheil Saakashvili’s administration making a deal with the devil?

Blog entry | March 21, 2012

Criticism and protests around the World Water Forum have highlighted the risk of hydropower projects being greenwashed and the dangers these installations can pose to people and nature in many countries.

Publications

Study | June 7, 2012

Cooperation in the energy sector is one of the European Union’s key priorities in its relationships with neighbouring states. Although the promotion of energy efficiency, energy savings and the use of renewable energy sources should be the primary areas of cooperation along with “energy security”, the latter receives the lion’s share of attention and in several cases also a disproportionally large amount of financial support. This can have several negative environmental and social implications as this study shows.

Briefing | May 9, 2012

In recent years Georgia’s government has sought to position the country as a future regional renewable energy hub. Governmental plans include the construction of transmission lines and numerous hydropower plants (HPPs), in order to ensure electricity exports to Turkey and subsequently to gain access to the south-east European market by 2015-2017. The number and technical design of the planned HPPs do not comply with the principles of sustainable development, and they are bound to have serious negative impacts on the environment.

Briefing | November 21, 2011

The proposed Khudoni hydro power plant poses the risk of an ecological disaster in one of the most amazing highland regions of Georgia. Additionally, the economic justification of the project is doubtful because the contract with the completely unknown, offshore Virgin Islands registered Georgian-Indian Company Transelectrica Ltd, is based on the BOO (Build-Own-Operate) principle that does not promise any significant income for the Georgian budget.

Briefing | July 23, 2009

The energy policy of the Georgian government supported by a number of IFIs, aims at utilising the hydroenergy potential in the country in order to overcome the existing energy crisis. But effectively, this policy has the potential to cause significant negative impact on the environment, to drastically change the social and demographic situation in Georgia's mountain areas and to devastate the existing cultural heritage.

Advocacy letter | July 23, 2009

We have received the following responses:

  • On July 29, 2009 from EBRD (pdf here).
  • On August 4, 2009 from EIB (pdf here).
  • On August 27, 2009 from World Bank (pdf here).