More questions asked about EBRD and EIB transparency
Bankwatch Mail | October 8, 2012
The European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development have been awarded some of the worst transparency scores for international finance institutions in this year's Aid Transparency Index, published in early October by the campaign group Publish What You Fund.
This article is from Issue 53 of our quarterly newsletter Bankwatch Mail
Browse all articles on the right
With a score of 44 percent the EIB comes 36th out of 72 organisations assessed. The EBRD came in 21st with a score of 54.8 percent.
Bankwatch's EBRD coordinator Ionut Apostol commented: “The news that the EBRD has failed to make significant progress on transparency is particularly concerning as this year the EBRD expanded its area of operations to include North Africa, a region where transparency in building post revolutionary societies is key.”
Bankwatch's EIB coordinator Anna Roggenbuck reacted to the EIB just barely scraping into Publish What You Fund's 'moderate' transparency category, saying: “This is unacceptable for an official EU body. Europeans and those impacted by the EIB's investments have the right to know exactly where and how the EU bank spends its money. The EIB must comply fully with EU legislation on access to information. And it must begin proactively disseminating comprehensive information about its operations to the public in a way that goes beyond the limited facts and figures currently available on its website.”
A particular problem undermining the transparency of both public banks is their continuing reference to commercial confidentiality as a justification for concealing important information from the public. The European Parliament has repeatedly called on the EIB to make more information available, especially in light of the EU growth package that includes a EUR 60 billion increase in EIB lending.
David Hall-Matthews, Director of Publish What You Fund, said: “There is too little readily available information about aid, which undermines the efforts of those who both give and receive it. Transparency is essential if aid is to truly deliver on its promise.”
Read more: The 2012 Aid Transparency Index is available at: http://www.publishwhatyoufund.org
Bankwatch Mail 53
Go to articles list with summaries >>>
EU budget 2014-20: The only way is up for climate allocations
The EU's pie in the sky: New analysis questions further funding support for aviation
Making sure EU funds pave the way to cleaner transport
The EU budget needs to be greener, not leaner and meaner
Feeding the fire: EU money blocked for one Czech incinerator, yet more still in the pipeline
Latest waste plans set to keep Sofia bottom of Europe's waste pile
New study: Clean energy investments will pay off at scale
EU budget debate: Some one trillion euro questions and answers
EU money well spent - New map of projects
EU funds to make Latvia the greenest country in the world? A vision still on paper
Czech transport investments going nowhere fast
More questions asked about EBRD and EIB transparency
Croatian coal power plans advancing despite legal violations and economic unfeasibility
Hoyer and out: New EIB president muddles through European parliament hearing
Egypt's turmoil is a distraction from the west's economic agenda
The Oil Road - How a done deal continues to unravel
How the facts got in the way of a good EBRD Roma headline
Money, and the EU's climate agenda, to burn: EBRD mining strategy on a carbon collision course